Header graphic for print
Federal Regulations Advisor Insight and Commentary on U.S. Government Regulatory Affairs

Tag Archives: United States Supreme Court

Monday Morning Regulatory Review 3/6/17: Reconsidering WOTUS; Transgender Guidance Appeal Ignominious End & Proposed Rules to Delay Rules

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The current Administration continued its undoing of prior the Administration’s priorities, but with more finesse.  The definition of Waters of the United States that garnered so much attention during the last Administration was put on the sideline for an extended period last week, with ramifications for several court cases.  The direct challenge to the rescinded… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 2/27/17: Transgender Student Bathroom Deguidance; Student Loan Cost Guidance Adherence; Immigration Enforcement Revisited; ORNA Good Cause Intercircuit Conflict & Implementation Executive Order

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

“Guidance” seems to have been the word for last week and that requires many words to explain.  Agencies rescinded prior Administration guidance that is currently being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), a district court questioned whether the current Administration would adhere to a prior guidance document, an agency revisited enforcement guidance while… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 1/16/17: WOTUS Jurisdiction & Venue; Arbitration Bars; Deference without Deference; Mandatory Duties & Remedies; Regulatory Accountability Act Reprise; Expedited Removal and Cubans; Good Cause Overdose & Communicable Disease Incaution

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Legislation, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) added to its argument calendar Friday, including several that could implicate future regulatory practice – including jurisdiction to review regulations and the potential scope of arbitration-limiting regulations.  In lesser lights, a Court of Appeals determined that an agency’s interpretation was correct without the agency, while a district court imposed… Continue Reading

Tuesday Morning Regulatory Review – 1/3/17: Statutes of Limitation & Regulations; Finality, Power & Constitutionality; Another Sex & Gender Preliminary Injunction; Streaming Suit; Effective Date Delay Dance; Inaction as Action; Energy Efficiency Standards Efficiencies; and Irrelevant and Relevant Facts

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Welcome back for the fifth anniversary post of the Federal Regulations Advisor (No. 393) and a new year of poking the Federal regulatory bear (and sometimes praising it).  Among highlights from regulatory practice in the past few weeks are a recurring regulatory misinterpretation of a statute of limitations, a new intercircuit conflict over appointments of… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 12/19/16: Continuing Reporting Obligations; Litigation Risk & Process Speed; FAR Injunction Notice, Land Use Planning and Plans & a Programming Note

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

With the 30-day deadline for making rules effecting during the current Administration fast approaching (Wednesday), agencies took a number of actions that raise concerns – or at least perceived concerns.  One final rule challenges a court determination of the agency’s authority, while another agency took pains to adopt an interim rule on a not-very-controversial subject. … Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 12/12/16: Administration’s Litigation Twilight; Delay, Haste, Explanation & Air, Cell, Wi-Fi

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The twilight of an Administration brings out some haste to institutionalize policy through regulations and also complex litigating postures driven by policy and institutional concerns, reflected last week in several procedural motions and decisions.  Curiously, a final rule was promulgated to respond to a remand over a decade old, raising a fundamental question of timeliness. … Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/28/16: Overtime Increase Rule Enjoined; Buckyballs Rule Vacated; and Agency Demarche & Prepaid Cards

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

A short work week did not mean a lack of regulatory substance, something else to be thankful for.  In two significant decisions declaring final rules to be turkeys, a district court preliminarily enjoined an agency rule potentially effecting 4.2 million American wage earners, while a Court of Appeals decision vacated a rule that effectively prohibited… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/21/16: Persuader Rule Set Aside; Nursing Home Arbitration Bar Enjoined; Executive Immigration Action Litigation Postponed; Agency Authority Retread & Final Regulatory Agenda

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

Several regulatory highlights from the last week illustrate the more forthright and subtle aspects of the transition from one Administration to the next.  A judgment in one district court probably sounded the death knell for a major labor regulation while another district court enjoined a regulation barring arbitration clauses.  Judgment and discretion were displayed in… Continue Reading

Presidential Regulatory Transition: A Post-Election Monday Morning Review – 11/14/16

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Understanding the regulatory significance of the 2016 Presidential election focuses on both the authority of the current President of the United States (POTUS) and the President-elect of the United States.  The current POTUS, quite naturally, will seek to institutionalize his legacy while the incoming POTUS will seek to undo his predecessor’s regulatory actions that are… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/7/16: SCOTUS Grants New Regulatory Preemption Case

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) added another administrative law case to its argument docket on Friday, granting certiorari in Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils (SCOTUSblog case page), a case of whether deference is due a regulatory interpretation of a statute that preempts State law.  The issues present an opportunity for clarification of… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/31/16: Sex, Identity, Statute, Regulation, and Guidance; Blacklist Blacklisted; Wellness Complaint & Education Borrowers Defenses

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

Four highlights in regulatory practice from the past week present diverse but overlapping issues.  The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) granted review in a case that may or may not have significant regulatory implications, but certainly contains drama.  Another Administration priority of enforcing its preferences through procurement contracts was enjoined, setting the stage for a… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/17/16: Mortgage Lending Enforcement Failure; Labor Complaints Contract Clause & Pipeline Emergency Confusion

Posted in Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

A major loss for the Administration’s policy occurred last week in the failure of a most significant enforcement of post-mortgage-crisis legislation, but not in the organic constitutional way that garnered much attention, but rather in the field of specific rights and administrative law.  A new challenge was filed to another Administration signature regulation – in… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/3/16: SCOTUS Bereft & Trucking Data Concrete Injury

Posted in Judicial Process

Hard news last week was hard to acquire and the negative is worth noting, but for two points.  First, major nationwide decisions on regulatory process are unlikely in the near future for want of cases on the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS)’s argument calendar.  Second, a recent district court decision illustrates the problem of concrete… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/26/16: Narrowing Safety Standards Exemptions Still Standards; Money Laundering Adjudication by Regulation; To Be or Not To Be Autonomous Vehicle Policy & Regulatory Week Ahead

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Regulatory practice highlights this week seem to focus on the margins of general practice and unique relationships of specialty practice.  In one decision, a court of appeals held that an agency failed to follow statutory requirements that supplanted the default requirements while a district court stayed and remanded an unusual regulation as adjudication for failure… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/19/16: Firearms & Mental Health; Plain Future Contingencies; and Medical Facility Preparedness Standards

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The campaign for the White House overshadows regulatory practice for another week, but some unique issues deserve note.  In one decision, a court of appeals reversed and remanded a dismissal order for further consideration of constitutional issues by the district court in an instance where Congress defunded a regulatory relief program that might have avoided… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/12/16: Silence, Gaps, Limits & Tips; Flashing Lights, Highway Guidance & Standing; and Remanded Emissions Budgets Return

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Two interesting cases were handed down last week.  One is a complicated dissent from denial of a petition for rehearing en banc that raises questions of agency regulation of a subject that falls either in a gap in the statute or outside the subject of the statute.  The second case focuses on standing to challenge… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 8/8/16: Political Free Speech; Tax Preparers End & Intercircuit Nonacquiescence and Consistency

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Three highlights from the past week in regulatory practice:  One court of appeals found that an agency regulation likely violated a plaintiffs’ rights to free speech as applied and remanded for the district court to enter a preliminary injunction.  A district court brought the long-running competition over preparing tax forms one step closer to resolution… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 7/25/16: Immigration Rule or Non-Rule Rehearing; Contraceptives Information Request & Zubik Review; Distance Learning Accreditation & Payday Loans

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Inter-convention, highlights from regulatory practice might be sparse, but both litigation and regulation provide some spice.  The Administration filed a petition for rehearing in the immigration policy case and a further response to the remand of a dozen decisions on the Administration’s contraceptive mandate application to religious organizations.  Two rules with regulatory process implications were… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Review – 2015 Term Ramifications for Regulatory Practice

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) declined or was unable to resolve several regulatory issues in the Term just ended, but its few substantive decisions set in motion significant changes in the regulatory process.  Three cases made key points: Congress may not expand the scope of injury necessary to sue in federal court. While agencies… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 7/11/16: A Regulatory Litigation Snapshot

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The shortened holiday week generated few regulatory events and no real highlights, creating an opportunity to survey the major regulatory litigation as this Administration enters its final six months.  This post highlights major litigation over the Administration’s priorities – particularly those stayed or preliminarily enjoined, and those at risk.  The extent of this litigation risk… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 7/4/16: Agency Exceeds Authority in Limiting Obamacare Exceptions; Second Persuader Challenge Persuaded; Conviction Guidance as Final Agency Action & Regulatory Deck-Clearing

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Process, Regulatory Flexibility & Small Business

Independence Day – a day to celebrate the right to choose between praising or criticizing the administrative state – or both.  Several courts took exception from Administration regulatory actions in the past week, including a regulation that exceeded the agency’s authority, a regulation that likely failed to comport with a number of superior requirements, and… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 6/27/16: Drone Regulations Finally Fly; Hydraulic Fracking Rule Drilled; First Persuader Decision Unpersuaded; Compost Guidance Composted & Civil Monetary Penalties Adjusted

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Regulatory Process

With the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) term likely ending today and with no additional regulatory decisions expected, the eagerly awaited drone regulations leads this week’s interest in regulatory practice.  In litigation, district courts finalized setting aside a major hydraulic fracturing rule, declined to temporarily enjoin a significant labor – management reporting rule, and prospectively… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Affirms Injunction of Obama Administration Immigration Policy with Silence

Posted in Judicial Process, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in United States v. Texas today affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Firth Circuit decision by an equally divided Court (4 – 4):  the preliminary injunction continues to bar the Obama Administration’s deferred action and employment authorization program for aliens.  The Fifth Circuit decision will have… Continue Reading

SCOTUS: Agency Must Explain Changed Position or Lose Chevron Deference

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

In a decision turning on black-letter law, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) reiterated Administrative Procedure Act (APA) precedent that an agency must explain its change in position and remanded Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro for further proceedings in the court below.  SCOTUS found that the Department of Labor (DOL) failed to adequately explain its… Continue Reading