Header graphic for print
Federal Regulations Advisor Insight and Commentary on U.S. Government Regulatory Affairs

Tag Archives: intercircuit conflict

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 2/27/17: Transgender Student Bathroom Deguidance; Student Loan Cost Guidance Adherence; Immigration Enforcement Revisited; ORNA Good Cause Intercircuit Conflict & Implementation Executive Order

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

“Guidance” seems to have been the word for last week and that requires many words to explain.  Agencies rescinded prior Administration guidance that is currently being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), a district court questioned whether the current Administration would adhere to a prior guidance document, an agency revisited enforcement guidance while… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 2/6/17: Gorsuch to SCOTUS; Regulatory Budgeting; Fiduciary Rule Reconsideration; Congressional Disapproval Resurrection; and Petitions & Political Debates

Posted in Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Process, Regulatory Process

A complicated and busy week in regulatory practice requires extended comments and a little patience.  The President of the United States (POTUS) nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and that will likely soon require new thinking about judicial deference to agency interpretations.  POTUS… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 1/16/17: WOTUS Jurisdiction & Venue; Arbitration Bars; Deference without Deference; Mandatory Duties & Remedies; Regulatory Accountability Act Reprise; Expedited Removal and Cubans; Good Cause Overdose & Communicable Disease Incaution

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Legislation, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) added to its argument calendar Friday, including several that could implicate future regulatory practice – including jurisdiction to review regulations and the potential scope of arbitration-limiting regulations.  In lesser lights, a Court of Appeals determined that an agency’s interpretation was correct without the agency, while a district court imposed… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/19/16: Firearms & Mental Health; Plain Future Contingencies; and Medical Facility Preparedness Standards

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The campaign for the White House overshadows regulatory practice for another week, but some unique issues deserve note.  In one decision, a court of appeals reversed and remanded a dismissal order for further consideration of constitutional issues by the district court in an instance where Congress defunded a regulatory relief program that might have avoided… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/5/16: Guns, Drugs, and Guidelines; Nonacquiescence Not Arbitrary and Capricious; & Anti-Bacterial Soap and Passport Over-Regulation

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Labor Day 2016 will be no holiday for regulatory experazzi, at least in this post.  Last week, a court of appeals affirmed dismissal of a host of constitutional claims that overshadowed an ineffectively plead Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claim – and the decision reprises the circuit law on when guidance becomes a rule only to… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 8/8/16: Political Free Speech; Tax Preparers End & Intercircuit Nonacquiescence and Consistency

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Three highlights from the past week in regulatory practice:  One court of appeals found that an agency regulation likely violated a plaintiffs’ rights to free speech as applied and remanded for the district court to enter a preliminary injunction.  A district court brought the long-running competition over preparing tax forms one step closer to resolution… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Review – 2015 Term Ramifications for Regulatory Practice

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) declined or was unable to resolve several regulatory issues in the Term just ended, but its few substantive decisions set in motion significant changes in the regulatory process.  Three cases made key points: Congress may not expand the scope of injury necessary to sue in federal court. While agencies… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Remands Contraceptives Regulation Cases to Uncertain Future

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Monday remanded to the lower courts its docket of cases raising the question of whether the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sufficiently accommodated religiously affiliated non-profits in its exception from the contraceptives mandate.  The SCOTUS orders in Zubik v. Burwell and its dozen fellow travelers make… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Warns Concrete Injury Needed to Enforce Statutory Rights

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) today returned the critical case of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to decide whether plaintiff Robins had established a concrete injury.  While Spokeo resonates deeply in the class action milieu, but it serves also as a warning that Article… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 1/18/16: SCOTUS Returns; Law Practice & Mortgage Relief Regulation; V2V Communications; and No Reginfo

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) returned last week to open several new lines of inquiry that impact regulatory practice, but has not yet decided whether the hear the case of the year. At the trial level, a district court invalidated narrow regulations applicable to attorneys practicing law in one federalized realm. The Department of… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/16/15: Food Safety Rules Up; Energy Efficiency Removal; Conflict Minerals Review Denial; & WOTUS Forward

Posted in Executive - OMB Review, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

The most significant agency action in regulatory practice last week may have been the release of three long-delayed Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) final rules. Courts took a number of small steps toward resolving challenges to Administration priority regulations, but no particular signal from these actions appears evident, except for the affirmance of the preliminary… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/9/15: Obamacare Contraceptive Non-Profit Sequel; Crowdfunding Uncrowded; & Electric Water Effluents

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Flexibility & Small Business

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) granted certiorari in seven Obamacare contraceptive coverage cases signaling the return of an agency regulatory compliance issue, not a constitutional or “rights” issue. Still noteworthy, however, are two other recent actions: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adoption of crowdfunding rules and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publication of… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/21/15: Contraceptive Percolation; FLSA Home Care Delay & Behavioral Science

Posted in Judicial Process, Regulatory Process

Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA) percolated back to the forefront of regulatory practice last week with a new conceptual intercircuit conflict. A notice relating to the even longer running issue of labor standards applicable to home health care aids raises questions of how an agency should reset effective and compliance dates… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/14/15: Human Research; Food Safety Rules; Extraordinary Writs Declined; Finality Petition & Obamacare Coverage Regulation Enjoined

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Flexibility & Small Business, Regulatory Process

New food safety rules and a proposed common rule on protection of human subjects in research deserve attention in the regulatory process. An unsurprising denial of an extraordinary writ and an unsurprising petition for certiorari deserve as much attention as a surprising injunction against an insurance coverage regulation in the judicial process.

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/7/15: Inter-agency Sub-delegation; WOTUS Injunction Limited & Mineral Payments Disclosure Reset

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Regulatory highlights from the last week could fill pages, but only three receive attention here. First, another court of appeals weighed in against one agency subdelegating authority to another agency. Second, a following up on last week’s Waters of the United States preliminary injunction clarified application to the plaintiff States. And third, a district court… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 5/18/15: Snakes in the Interior; Traditional Waters of the United States; Retirement Account Fiduciary Standards; & Upcoming Discussions of Interest

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

A most interesting opinion from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia preliminarily enjoined the Department of the Interior (DOI) from enforcing regulations that prohibited the interstate transportation of two species of reptiles found to be “injurious” under the Lacey Act. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 5/4/15: SCOTUS Statutory Standing; Emergency Generators; & H-2B Regulations Again

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

Three unrelated highlights from last week in regulatory practice: The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) agreed last Monday to consider a case of private causes of action that has potentially stunning constitutional and regulatory implications. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit “reversed” an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation that… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 4/13/15: Waters of the United States; Renewable Fuels Consent Decree; Open Internet Utility Rule; Shepherd’s Wages; Immigration Executive Action Litigation VII; and Religious Workers & Legal Status

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Half a dozen highlights from regulatory practice last week – from environmental to communications, to labor to immigration. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers (Engineers) submitted a controversial Waters of the United States (WOTUS) final rule for executive and interagency review, and EPA also proposed resolution of the long delayed Renewable… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Rejects D.C. Circuit Notice & Comment Rulemaking Requirement for Changing Agency Interpretation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) held today, in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, that an interpretative rule does not require advance notice and an opportunity for public comment under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) no matter when the agency adopts the interpretation, unanimously reversing the contrary decision of the United States Court of Appeals… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 3/9/15: H-2B Regulations Vacated – Again; Immigration Executive Action Litigation IV; and Aircraft Engines & Greenhouse Gases

Posted in Agency Authority, Executive - OMB Review, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Last week’s highlights in regulatory practice were few and tread familiar ground, but have much meaning. The Department of Labor (DOL) suffered another loss in the jurisdictional kerfuffle over the non-agricultural workers visa program when a district court vacated its 2008 regulations, just as it had previously done with more recent regulations, and contrary to… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 12/22/14: H-2B Visa Regulation Vacated; Immigration Executive Action Dicta; Agency Regulatory Plans & OMB Completions; EPA Coal Ash Rules; Uniform Grant Rules; Trucker Hours of Service; & ACUS Recommendations

Posted in Agency Authority, Executive - OMB Review, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The penultimate Monday of the year, when many federal workers are using rather than losing annual leave, is hardly the time to believe that the regulatory machine is slowing down.  Quite to the contrary, after Congress has left town, both the courts and the agencies remain at full throttle.  Judicial highlights of the past week… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Argument Preview: Must Agencies Use Notice and Comment Rulemaking to Change Interpretation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Next Monday, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will hear argument in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, No. 13-1041, asking whether a federal agency must engage in advance notice and public comment rulemaking pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) before it can significantly alter an established interpretive rule articulating the agency’s interpretation of an… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/17/14: Obamacare Subsidies Docket; Obamacare 2nd Contraceptives Accommodation & SCOTUS Criminal / Administrative Deference Invitation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Last week focused on appellate practice, notably cases related to but not necessarily before, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS).  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delayed further consideration of the issue of whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) could interpret the Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act… Continue Reading

HUD Housing Disparate Impact Rules Vacated – How an APA Case Could Clarify Complicated Private Litigation

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 2013 rules (ostensibly) under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) establishing disparate-impact liability in a case revolving on homeowners’ insurance coverage policies.  Plaintiffs in American Insurance Association v. Department of Housing and Urban Development claimed that HUD… Continue Reading