Header graphic for print
Federal Regulations Advisor Insight and Commentary on U.S. Government Regulatory Affairs

Tag Archives: Chevron

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 5/22/17: De-Regulating Model Aircraft

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, last Friday in Taylor v. Huerta, partially vacated the Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft interim final rule (IFR).  The panel concluded that Congress explicitly barred the FAA from promulgating “any rule or… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 4/24/17: Buy and Hire American; Rethinking Tax Regulations Review Exceptionalism & Executive Order Law

Posted in Executive - OMB Review, Regulatory Process

Executive Orders dominated last week in regulatory practice, with one policy redirection and a second that has potential for doctrinal change.  A limited executive and interagency review docket, Congressional recess ahead of a budget showdown, and judicial review being held in abeyance in most challenges to regulations leave little more to discuss, but a summation… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 2/27/17: Transgender Student Bathroom Deguidance; Student Loan Cost Guidance Adherence; Immigration Enforcement Revisited; ORNA Good Cause Intercircuit Conflict & Implementation Executive Order

Posted in Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

“Guidance” seems to have been the word for last week and that requires many words to explain.  Agencies rescinded prior Administration guidance that is currently being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), a district court questioned whether the current Administration would adhere to a prior guidance document, an agency revisited enforcement guidance while… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 2/6/17: Gorsuch to SCOTUS; Regulatory Budgeting; Fiduciary Rule Reconsideration; Congressional Disapproval Resurrection; and Petitions & Political Debates

Posted in Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Process, Regulatory Process

A complicated and busy week in regulatory practice requires extended comments and a little patience.  The President of the United States (POTUS) nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and that will likely soon require new thinking about judicial deference to agency interpretations.  POTUS… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 12/19/16: Continuing Reporting Obligations; Litigation Risk & Process Speed; FAR Injunction Notice, Land Use Planning and Plans & a Programming Note

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

With the 30-day deadline for making rules effecting during the current Administration fast approaching (Wednesday), agencies took a number of actions that raise concerns – or at least perceived concerns.  One final rule challenges a court determination of the agency’s authority, while another agency took pains to adopt an interim rule on a not-very-controversial subject. … Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/28/16: Overtime Increase Rule Enjoined; Buckyballs Rule Vacated; and Agency Demarche & Prepaid Cards

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

A short work week did not mean a lack of regulatory substance, something else to be thankful for.  In two significant decisions declaring final rules to be turkeys, a district court preliminarily enjoined an agency rule potentially effecting 4.2 million American wage earners, while a Court of Appeals decision vacated a rule that effectively prohibited… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/7/16: SCOTUS Grants New Regulatory Preemption Case

Posted in Agency Authority, Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) added another administrative law case to its argument docket on Friday, granting certiorari in Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils (SCOTUSblog case page), a case of whether deference is due a regulatory interpretation of a statute that preempts State law.  The issues present an opportunity for clarification of… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/10/16: Fiduciary Litigation and Arbitration; Mandatory Labeling Speech & Nonacquiescence Regulation Petitions

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

New grist for the regulatory litigation mill emerged in an additional but very different challenge to one aspect of a suite of highly litigated rules; a follow-on challenge to an agency’s lack of response to vacatur of prior statutorily required regulations; and a challenge to an agency policy guiding how it will respond to adverse… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/19/16: Firearms & Mental Health; Plain Future Contingencies; and Medical Facility Preparedness Standards

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The campaign for the White House overshadows regulatory practice for another week, but some unique issues deserve note.  In one decision, a court of appeals reversed and remanded a dismissal order for further consideration of constitutional issues by the district court in an instance where Congress defunded a regulatory relief program that might have avoided… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 9/12/16: Silence, Gaps, Limits & Tips; Flashing Lights, Highway Guidance & Standing; and Remanded Emissions Budgets Return

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies

Two interesting cases were handed down last week.  One is a complicated dissent from denial of a petition for rehearing en banc that raises questions of agency regulation of a subject that falls either in a gap in the statute or outside the subject of the statute.  The second case focuses on standing to challenge… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Review – 2015 Term Ramifications for Regulatory Practice

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) declined or was unable to resolve several regulatory issues in the Term just ended, but its few substantive decisions set in motion significant changes in the regulatory process.  Three cases made key points: Congress may not expand the scope of injury necessary to sue in federal court. While agencies… Continue Reading

SCOTUS: Agency Must Explain Changed Position or Lose Chevron Deference

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

In a decision turning on black-letter law, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) reiterated Administrative Procedure Act (APA) precedent that an agency must explain its change in position and remanded Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro for further proceedings in the court below.  SCOTUS found that the Department of Labor (DOL) failed to adequately explain its… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/9/15: Obamacare Contraceptive Non-Profit Sequel; Crowdfunding Uncrowded; & Electric Water Effluents

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Flexibility & Small Business

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) granted certiorari in seven Obamacare contraceptive coverage cases signaling the return of an agency regulatory compliance issue, not a constitutional or “rights” issue. Still noteworthy, however, are two other recent actions: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adoption of crowdfunding rules and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publication of… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Rejects EPA Refusal to Consider Costs in Power Plant Rules — Remand for Further Analysis

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

A deeply divided United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in Michigan v. EPA, today held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “strayed well beyond the bounds of reasonable interpretation in concluding that cost is not a factor relevant to the appropriateness of regulating power plants.” SCOTUS reversed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Upholds Obamacare Subsidies at Chevron “0” – Cautions to Congress and the Agencies

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) today decided, in King v. Burwell, that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare or PPACA) permitted health care insurance premium tax subsidies for those enrolled in Federal Exchanges, not just State Exchanges. But there is a catch: SCOTUS found Obamacare so poorly written that ambiguity must be… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 6/22/15: Truck Emissions Standards & Orphan Drugs Revisited

Posted in Agency Authority, Regulatory Process

While we await the major decisions of the year by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), the regulatory process was relatively quiet last week. The most significant activity focused on proposed emission standards for heavy duty trucks and a proposed rethinking of the orphan drug program, both of which deserve critical review for regulatory process… Continue Reading

SCOTUS Rejects D.C. Circuit Notice & Comment Rulemaking Requirement for Changing Agency Interpretation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) held today, in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, that an interpretative rule does not require advance notice and an opportunity for public comment under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) no matter when the agency adopts the interpretation, unanimously reversing the contrary decision of the United States Court of Appeals… Continue Reading

SCOTUS, Interpretative Rules & the Government’s Shifting Interpretation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) oral argument on Monday in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association underscored the complexity of the distinction between legislative rules and interpretative rules under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the degree of deference that courts grant to agencies in resolving ambiguity under their delegated programmatic statutes.  Oral argument may… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 12/1/14: Electric Generating Hazardous Emissions & Costs; Quintennial Ozone Standard; Calorie Counting; and Election Financing Disclosure

Posted in Executive - OMB Review, Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

The very short Thanksgiving workweek was punctuated by a significant new United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) grant of review of requirements for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in regulating hazardous air pollutants – this time by electric utilities.  The day before Thanksgiving has traditionally been a day for rolling out controversial actions to reduce adverse… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/17/14: Obamacare Subsidies Docket; Obamacare 2nd Contraceptives Accommodation & SCOTUS Criminal / Administrative Deference Invitation

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Last week focused on appellate practice, notably cases related to but not necessarily before, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS).  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delayed further consideration of the issue of whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) could interpret the Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 11/10/14: SCOTUS to Review Obamacare Subsidy Rule; Final Rule Statute of Limitations; Gainful Employment Metrics Litigation; Incorporation by Reference; and WOTUS Comments

Posted in Judicial Process, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Last week in regulations was entirely expected – it was all just a matter of time.  The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) agreed that it will decide this Term whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may, by regulation, extend Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA) subsidies to participants in federally-operated health care… Continue Reading

HUD Housing Disparate Impact Rules Vacated – How an APA Case Could Clarify Complicated Private Litigation

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 2013 rules (ostensibly) under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) establishing disparate-impact liability in a case revolving on homeowners’ insurance coverage policies.  Plaintiffs in American Insurance Association v. Department of Housing and Urban Development claimed that HUD… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/6/14: Failing Grades Episode 4; Oklahoma & Obamacare Intercircuit Conflict; and Contractor Minimum Wage

Posted in Agency Authority, Judicial Review & Remedies, Regulatory Process

Two district court decisions from last week warrant some comment while agencies added more fodder for the judicial review of rules.  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia again revisited the Administration’s failing grades in regulating for-profit colleges, and their scores have not improved, but the court failed to incentivize compliance with… Continue Reading

Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 8/4/14: Obamacare Tax Subsidies Intercircuit Conflict & COOL First Amendment Regulations

Posted in Constitutional Issues in Regulations, Judicial Review & Remedies

Little new and unexpected agencies activity compels review in the last week, but the courts were fully engaged on two very different, critical regulatory issues.  The intercircuit conflict over whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may adopt regulations extending Obamacare tax credits beyond the 16 State-established Obamacare exchanges to include the federal-established exchanges in 34… Continue Reading